Well, when we got together, we were comparing our lists, and on his list was this project that we pulled the funds for. And he said, “I’m disappointed that this hasn’t been accomplished.” And I said, well, we pulled the funds. He’s like, “Well, my expectation was still that you had achieved the project.” I learned, at that point, the importance of the interaction between the managers and employees. Because shame on me for never checking in with my manager to see if I was delivering what he expected. Shame on him for never checking in with me over about an eighth month period of time and saying, “Hey, where are you on this project?”
So to the point that we’ve been talking about, this front end being clear on the behaviors, the outcomes, not the tasks, we don’t want to constrain the autonomy, but being really clear in saying, here’s what it would look like for you to achieve this level of performance. And then back to the 50/50 proposition that we talked about there. There’s accountability for the organization or leaders to be setting those expectations and closing the loop with a feedback conversation. There is also accountability for the employees to go back if they’re not getting that feedback and if they’re uncertain they’re meeting those expectations and they’re feeling dissatisfied or they’re not fully engaged because they don’t know if they’re having the impact that they should, then it’s their obligation to go back and get it as well.